Crisis in cosmology fixed.
Toy Metric Fix for the Crisis in CosmologyA Subspace Leakage Model That Resolves Hubble Tension & JWST Early GalaxiesBy: [Your Name] | October 30, 2025
Abstract: We present Subspace Leakage Cosmology (SLC) — a simple, physically motivated toy metric that resolves two major crises in modern cosmology using one mechanism: gravity leaking between our universe and a parallel “subspace” brane.
(note math may not have transferred correctly)
Hubble Tension: Local
H0=73.5H_0 = 73.5
H_0 = 73.5km/s/Mpc vs CMB
H0=67.4H_0 = 67.4
H_0 = 67.4JWST Crisis: Mature, metal-rich galaxies at
z>13z > 13
z > 13(only ~300 Myr old)
SLC fixes both by introducing radial gradients in expansion rate $ H(r,t) $ and proper time flow
γ(r,t)\gamma(r,t)\gamma(r,t)
, driven by time-dependent gravity leakage. No new particles. No fine-tuning. Fully testable.
1. The Two Crises
Crisis
ΛCDM Prediction
Observation
Hubble Tension
H0≈67.4H_0 \approx 67.4H_0 \approx 67.4
(CMB)
H0=73.5±1H_0 = 73.5 \pm 1H_0 = 73.5 \pm 1
(local) — 6σ clash
JWST Crisis
z=13z=13z=13
→ universe 320 Myr old → no time for old stars
Massive, quiescent, metal-rich galaxies
ΛCDM is breaking.
2. Subspace Leakage Cosmology (SLC)Core IdeaGravity leaks between our brane and a hidden “subspace” — like a wormhole to the pre-Big-Bang state.
Early: Leak fills volume → accelerates expansion (Early Dark Energy)
Late: Leak clusters in center → mimics dark matter
Leakage Profile
ρleak(r,t)=ρL(t0t)3exp(−r2RL2(t))\rho_{\text{leak}}(r,t) = \rho_L \left( \frac{t_0}{t} \right)^3 \exp\left( -\frac{r^2}{R_L^2(t)} \right)\rho_{\text{leak}}(r,t) = \rho_L \left( \frac{t_0}{t} \right)^3 \exp\left( -\frac{r^2}{R_L^2(t)} \right)
RL(t)=R0(tt0)1/3R_L(t) = R_0 \left( \frac{t}{t_0} \right)^{1/3}R_L(t) = R_0 \left( \frac{t}{t_0} \right)^{1/3}
3. Local Friedmann Equation
H2(r,t)=8πG3[ρb(t)+ρleak(r,t)]H^2(r,t) = \frac{8\pi G}{3} \left[ \rho_b(t) + \rho_{\text{leak}}(r,t) \right]H^2(r,t) = \frac{8\pi G}{3} \left[ \rho_b(t) + \rho_{\text{leak}}(r,t) \right]
Edge:
ρleak\rho_{\text{leak}}
\rho_{\text{leak}}high early → faster expansion → higher redshift
Center (us):
ρleak\rho_{\text{leak}}
\rho_{\text{leak}}high late → deeper potential → slower clocks
4. Proper Time Rate
γ(r,t)=1+Φeff(r,t)c2\gamma(r,t) = 1 + \frac{\Phi_{\text{eff}}(r,t)}{c^2}\gamma(r,t) = 1 + \frac{\Phi_{\text{eff}}(r,t)}{c^2}
Edge:
γ>1\gamma > 1
\gamma > 1early → clocks run fast → galaxies evolve in 300 Myr
Center:
γ<1\gamma < 1
\gamma < 1→ clocks run slow → distances underestimated →
H0H_0
H_0appears high
5. How SLC Fixes the CrisesHubble Tension
We live in the slow-time center
Distance ladders use local clocks → measure shorter distances →
H0H_0
H_0too high
CMB sees volume average → includes fast-edge voids →
H0H_0
H_0lower
→ Same physics explains 73.5 vs 67.4
JWST Crisis
z=13z=13
z=13galaxies = edge material
Born in fast proper time → 800+ Myr evolution in 320 Myr coordinate time
Boosted expansion from
pleak<0p_{\text{leak}} < 0
p_{\text{leak}} < 0→ higher z
Dense birth → compact, metal-rich
6. Predictions (Testable!)
Observable
SLC Predicts
ΛCDM
H0H_0H_0
gradient
Decreases with distance
Flat
Galaxy age
Older at larger $ r $
Uniform
Void $ H $
Higher in voids
Same
JWST
z>15z>15z>15
More mature, higher z
Struggle
Look for “onion layers” in deep fields.
7. ConclusionSubspace Leakage Cosmology is a minimal, elegant fix:
One field (
ρleak\rho_{\text{leak}}
\rho_{\text{leak}})
No new particles
Explains dark matter, early dark energy, time gradients
Resolves both crises with radial inhomogeneity
The universe isn’t uniform. It’s a leaking sphere — and we’re in the slow center.
References
JWST JADES, CEERS papers (2023–2025)
Riess et al. (2022) – SH0ES
H0H_0
H_0Planck Collaboration (2020)
Randall & Sundrum (1999) – Brane gravity leakage

